BBUS vs. HELO
BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index, while HELO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBUS is passively managed, while HELO is actively managed. Over the past year, BBUS returned 27.47% vs 11.08% for HELO. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBUS charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.
Performance
BBUS vs. HELO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBUS achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 2.31% return.
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
HELO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 11.96% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 2.31% | 7.82% | 18.05% | 6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBUS and HELO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BBUS and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBUS vs. HELO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBUS
HELO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBUS
HELO
Financial Services
BBUS
HELO
Communication Services
BBUS
HELO
Consumer Cyclical
BBUS
HELO
Healthcare
BBUS
HELO
Industrials
BBUS
HELO
Consumer Defensive
BBUS
HELO
Energy
BBUS
HELO
Utilities
BBUS
HELO
Real Estate
BBUS
HELO
Basic Materials
BBUS
HELO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBUS vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank
BBUS
HELO
BBUS vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBUS | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 1.93 | +1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.76 | 8.55 | +5.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBUS | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 1.79 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.64 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
BBUS vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBUS drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, which is greater than HELO's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBUS and HELO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBUS | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -10.89% | -24.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -5.76% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.28% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -1.18% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 1.30% | +0.70% |
Volatility
BBUS vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) at 0.70%. This indicates that BBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBUS | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 0.70% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 4.99% | +3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 6.21% | +5.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 7.96% | +9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 7.96% | +11.63% |
BBUS vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBUS has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBUS vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison
BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than HELO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BBUS and HELO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBUS has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to HELO (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBUS dropped -35.35% vs HELO's -10.89%.
On 1-year performance, BBUS leads with 27.47% vs 11.08% for HELO. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, HELO has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 27.47% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.62% for HELO.
BBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HELO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.02% for BBUS and 0.50% for HELO.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBUS and HELO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer