BBSC vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BBSC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. BBSC is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, BBSC returned 41.21% vs 115.98% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. BBSC charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

BBSC vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 17.65% return.

BBSC

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: 21.58%
• 6M: 18.47%
• 1Y: 41.21%
• 3Y*: 19.70%
• 5Y*: 7.14%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 45.64%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 115.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSC vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	21.58%	20.36%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	17.65%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and WNTR is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.46

Return for Risk

BBSC vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSC

BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 78
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 82

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSC vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBSC	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.20	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	2.46	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.33	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.34	2.73	+1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.20	6.99	+7.21

BBSC vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBSC	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-42.65%	+11.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.54%	-42.65%	+33.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.02%	+4.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-20.87%	+9.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.91%	16.66%	-13.75%

Volatility

BBSC vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) is 5.25%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that BBSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBSC	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	18.14%	-12.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.39%	46.41%	-33.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.33%	53.16%	-33.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.97%	53.31%	-30.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.83%	53.31%	-30.48%

BBSC vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBSC vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	1.00%	1.13%	1.29%	1.58%	1.37%	1.06%	0.18%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	94.34%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBSC and WNTR in my portfolio?

BBSC and WNTR have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBSC or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to BBSC (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, BBSC or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 41.21% for BBSC. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBSC has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBSC or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 41.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBSC or WNTR?

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBSC or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 1.00% for BBSC.

What is the main difference between BBSC and WNTR?

BBSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.