BBSC vs. RB
BBSC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.
Performance
BBSC vs. RB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.76% return.
BBSC
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 35.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
RB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBSC vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 15.75% | 13.83% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.76% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSC and RB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSC vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank
BBSC
RB
BBSC vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSC | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSC | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 3.15 | -2.66 |
Drawdowns
BBSC vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and RB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSC | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -1.70% | -29.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -0.47% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.49% | -0.41% | -11.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | — | — |
Volatility
BBSC vs. RB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSC | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 6.21% | +12.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 6.21% | +16.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 6.21% | +16.65% |
BBSC vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBSC vs. RB - Dividend Comparison
BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than RB's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.06% | 0.18% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 2.00% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBSC and RB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.
RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.03% for BBSC.
BBSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.58% for RB.
Find the right allocation for BBSC and RB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer