PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSC vs. JQUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSC vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 22.80% return, which is significantly higher than JQUA's 15.84% return.


BBSC

1D
1.77%
1M
0.16%
6M
16.07%
YTD
22.80%
1Y
39.29%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.85%

JQUA

1D
0.79%
1M
1.13%
6M
13.59%
YTD
15.84%
1Y
23.18%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$572.49K$377.85K$898.85K
$27.54M$28.89M$36.27M

BBSC vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
22.80%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
15.84%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and JQUA is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.81

The correlation between BBSC and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBSC vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBSC
JQUA

Technology

18.9%
41.0%

Healthcare

16.8%
8.8%

Financial Services

15.7%
12.0%

Industrials

14.4%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
9.5%

Real Estate

7.5%
2.2%

Energy

4.5%
3.3%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
5.2%

Communication Services

2.4%
6.2%

Utilities

1.5%
1.2%

Technology

BBSC
18.9%
JQUA
41.0%

Healthcare

BBSC
16.8%
JQUA
8.8%

Financial Services

BBSC
15.7%
JQUA
12.0%

Industrials

BBSC
14.4%
JQUA
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BBSC
11.6%
JQUA
9.5%

Real Estate

BBSC
7.5%
JQUA
2.2%

Energy

BBSC
4.5%
JQUA
3.3%

Basic Materials

BBSC
4.0%
JQUA
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

BBSC
2.9%
JQUA
5.2%

Communication Services

BBSC
2.4%
JQUA
6.2%

Utilities

BBSC
1.5%
JQUA
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSC vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBSC vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBSCJQUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

3.27

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.57

13.35

+0.22

BBSC vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and JQUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSCJQUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-32.92%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-7.13%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-16.81%

-12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-22.47%

-8.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

0.00%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.20%

-4.10%

-7.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.74%

+1.16%

Volatility

BBSC vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 2.46%. This indicates that BBSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSCJQUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

2.46%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

9.45%

+3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.96%

12.01%

+6.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

15.73%

+7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.69%

17.92%

+4.77%

BBSC vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBSC vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than JQUA's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
0.99%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSC and JQUA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBSC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to JQUA (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.98% vs 8.63% for BBSC. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JQUA.

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.99% for BBSC.

BBSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while JQUA is Quality Factor. BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.12% for JQUA.

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSC and JQUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer