BBSC vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
BBSC and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBSC is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2020. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both BBSC and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BBSC vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBSC vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.23% | 10.38% | 12.31% | 20.07% | -19.75% | 15.44% | 11.94% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 10.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 0.93% return.
BBSC
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 25.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBSC vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BBSC vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
BBSC
IWM
BBSC vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSC | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.66 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.82 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | 6.76 | +0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSC | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.15 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.34 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSC and IWM is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BBSC vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.06% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
BBSC vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSC | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -59.05% | +28.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.59% | -13.74% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | -31.91% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.58% | -7.91% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -10.83% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.70% | -0.01% |
Volatility
BBSC vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 7.20% and 7.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBSC | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 7.47% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.48% | 14.47% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.02% | 23.18% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.97% | 22.55% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 22.99% | +0.04% |