PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSC vs. ISMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSC vs. ISMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly lower than ISMD's 21.54% return.


BBSC

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.71%
YTD
15.75%
6M
14.20%
1Y
35.98%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*

ISMD

1D
-1.62%
1M
5.36%
YTD
21.54%
6M
20.97%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSC vs. ISMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
15.75%10.38%12.31%20.07%-19.75%15.44%11.94%
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
21.54%4.14%9.53%16.74%-13.44%29.38%9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and ISMD is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.94

The correlation between BBSC and ISMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBSC vs. ISMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBSC
ISMD

Technology

18.5%
17.3%

Financial Services

16.9%
15.2%

Healthcare

15.7%
9.5%

Industrials

14.9%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
11.2%

Real Estate

7.7%
8.9%

Energy

6.4%
3.3%

Basic Materials

4.1%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
6.1%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.5%

Utilities

1.2%
3.3%

Technology

BBSC
18.5%
ISMD
17.3%

Financial Services

BBSC
16.9%
ISMD
15.2%

Healthcare

BBSC
15.7%
ISMD
9.5%

Industrials

BBSC
14.9%
ISMD
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BBSC
9.0%
ISMD
11.2%

Real Estate

BBSC
7.7%
ISMD
8.9%

Energy

BBSC
6.4%
ISMD
3.3%

Basic Materials

BBSC
4.1%
ISMD
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

BBSC
3.2%
ISMD
6.1%

Communication Services

BBSC
2.4%
ISMD
2.5%

Utilities

BBSC
1.2%
ISMD
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSC vs. ISMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSC
BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ISMD
ISMD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ISMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ISMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSC vs. ISMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSCISMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

3.84

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

12.04

+0.32

BBSC vs. ISMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the ISMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and ISMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBSCISMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

2.01

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.37

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.40

+0.09

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. ISMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum ISMD drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and ISMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSCISMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.96%

-44.60%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.54%

-9.64%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.32%

-26.64%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-26.64%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-1.62%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.49%

-8.17%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.07%

-0.15%

Volatility

BBSC vs. ISMD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) have volatilities of 4.91% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSCISMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

4.95%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

12.52%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

18.56%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.93%

20.87%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

23.74%

-0.88%

BBSC vs. ISMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ISMD's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBSC vs. ISMD - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than ISMD's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBSC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.03%1.13%1.29%1.58%1.37%1.06%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISMD
Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF
0.95%1.21%1.24%1.17%1.28%9.35%0.99%0.88%1.35%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BBSC and ISMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ISMD has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to BBSC (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs ISMD's -44.60%.

On 5-year performance, ISMD leads with 7.62% vs 6.64% for BBSC. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISMD has performed better with a 7.62% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ISMD.

BBSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.95% for ISMD.

BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while ISMD tracks Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 0.57% for ISMD.

ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSC and ISMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer