PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBP vs. XBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBP vs. XBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than XBI's 9.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BBP has outperformed XBI with an annualized return of 11.72%, while XBI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.


BBP

1D
2.44%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
8.38%
6M
9.14%
1Y
48.00%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
11.72%

XBI

1D
2.77%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
9.42%
6M
8.61%
1Y
62.35%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
1.14%
10Y*
8.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBP vs. XBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
8.38%33.15%3.32%17.88%0.85%-8.17%22.24%24.73%-13.95%24.07%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
9.42%35.89%1.01%7.60%-25.87%-20.45%48.33%32.56%-15.28%43.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BBP and XBI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014

0.92

The correlation between BBP and XBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBP vs. XBI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBP
XBI

Healthcare

100.0%
99.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

BBP
100.0%
XBI
99.8%

Basic Materials

BBP

-

XBI
0.2%

Communication Services

BBP

-

XBI

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBP

-

XBI

-

Consumer Defensive

BBP

-

XBI

-

Energy

BBP

-

XBI

-

Financial Services

BBP

-

XBI
0.2%

Industrials

BBP

-

XBI

-

Real Estate

BBP

-

XBI

-

Technology

BBP

-

XBI

-

Utilities

BBP

-

XBI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBP vs. XBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBP
BBP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

XBI
XBI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBP vs. XBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBPXBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

6.45

-1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.27

19.53

-3.26

BBP vs. XBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBP and XBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBPXBIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.45

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.04

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.27

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.36

+0.04

Drawdowns

BBP vs. XBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, smaller than the maximum XBI drawdown of -63.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and XBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBPXBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.32%

-63.89%

+19.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.72%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.09%

-32.99%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.28%

-54.71%

+16.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-63.89%

+19.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-22.89%

+18.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-20.93%

+8.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.20%

-0.24%

Volatility

BBP vs. XBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) is 8.03%, while SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that BBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBPXBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

9.69%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

20.31%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.84%

25.60%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

32.20%

-5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

32.00%

-4.59%

BBP vs. XBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XBI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBP vs. XBI - Dividend Comparison

BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.00%1.29%
XBI
SPDR S&P Biotech ETF
0.33%0.37%0.15%0.02%0.00%0.04%0.20%0.00%0.28%0.24%0.26%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BBP and XBI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XBI has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to BBP (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBP dropped -44.32% vs XBI's -63.89%.

On 10-year performance, BBP leads with 11.72% vs 8.53% for XBI. On fees, XBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BBP has been the lower-risk option at 8.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BBP has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.

XBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

BBP tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index, while XBI tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.35% for XBI.

XBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBP and XBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer