PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBP vs. ARKG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBP vs. ARKG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than ARKG's 25.20% return. Over the past 10 years, BBP has outperformed ARKG with an annualized return of 11.72%, while ARKG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.74% annualized return.


BBP

1D
2.44%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
8.38%
6M
9.14%
1Y
48.00%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
11.72%

ARKG

1D
6.93%
1M
21.79%
YTD
25.20%
6M
13.70%
1Y
60.42%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
-14.59%
10Y*
7.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBP vs. ARKG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
8.38%33.15%3.32%17.88%0.85%-8.17%22.24%24.73%-13.95%24.07%
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF
25.20%23.04%-28.24%16.22%-53.90%-33.92%180.40%44.00%-1.26%46.61%

Correlation

The correlation between BBP and ARKG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014

0.75

The correlation between BBP and ARKG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBP vs. ARKG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBP
ARKG

Healthcare

100.0%
99.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

BBP
100.0%
ARKG
99.2%

Basic Materials

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Communication Services

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Consumer Defensive

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Energy

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Financial Services

BBP

-

ARKG
0.5%

Industrials

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Real Estate

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Technology

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Utilities

BBP

-

ARKG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBP vs. ARKG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBP
BBP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKG
ARKG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ARKG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBP vs. ARKG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBPARKGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.20

2.21

+2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.27

5.29

+10.98

BBP vs. ARKG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the ARKG Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBP and ARKG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBPARKGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.46

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.32

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.19

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.15

+0.25

Drawdowns

BBP vs. ARKG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, smaller than the maximum ARKG drawdown of -83.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and ARKG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBPARKGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.32%

-83.59%

+39.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-27.51%

+18.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.09%

-51.96%

+25.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.28%

-80.18%

+41.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

-83.59%

+39.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-67.55%

+63.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-35.88%

+23.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

11.46%

-8.50%

Volatility

BBP vs. ARKG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) is 8.03%, while ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF (ARKG) has a volatility of 12.94%. This indicates that BBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBPARKGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

12.94%

-4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

29.51%

-10.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.84%

41.62%

-17.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.37%

45.71%

-19.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.41%

41.17%

-13.76%

BBP vs. ARKG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBP vs. ARKG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBP nor ARKG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKG
ARK Genomic Revolution Multi-Sector ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%0.85%3.14%0.82%1.34%0.00%0.00%
BBP
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.00%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBP and ARKG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKG has higher volatility (12.94%) compared to BBP (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBP dropped -44.32% vs ARKG's -83.59%.

On 10-year performance, BBP leads with 11.72% vs 7.74% for ARKG. On fees, ARKG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BBP has been the lower-risk option at 8.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BBP has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ARKG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.

BBP and ARKG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.75% for ARKG.

BBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBP and ARKG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer