BBP vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

BBP (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBP is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. BBP is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, BBP returned 53.81% vs 5.33% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. BBP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

BBP vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBP achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than ACLO's 2.41% return.

BBP

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 12.63%
• 6M: 12.20%
• 1Y: 53.81%
• 3Y*: 18.21%
• 5Y*: 10.95%
• 10Y*: 12.95%

ACLO

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 2.41%
• 6M: 2.54%
• 1Y: 5.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBP vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	12.63%	33.15%	-1.50%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.41%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BBP and ACLO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	-0.02

The correlation between BBP and ACLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BBP vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBP

BBP Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBP vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBP	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	7.36	-5.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	15.22	-12.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	3.45	-2.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.83	19.99	-14.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.11	166.22	-148.11

BBP vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBP Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBP and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBP vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBP drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBP and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBP	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.32%	-1.01%	-43.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.28%	-0.27%	-9.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	0.00%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.99%	-0.04%	-11.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	0.03%	+2.95%

Volatility

BBP vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that BBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBP	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	0.19%	+6.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.81%	0.58%	+18.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.90%	0.73%	+23.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.34%	1.07%	+25.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.41%	1.07%	+26.34%

BBP vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBP vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.90%	4.87%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	0.00%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBP and ACLO in my portfolio?

BBP and ACLO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBP or ACLO?

BBP has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBP dropped -44.32% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, BBP or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, BBP leads with 53.81% vs 5.33% for ACLO. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBP or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, BBP has performed better with a 53.81% return vs 5.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBP or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBP or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.00% for BBP.

What is the main difference between BBP and ACLO?

BBP is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBP and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.36 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.