PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBMUX vs. BBGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBMUX vs. BBGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX) and Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMUX achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than BBGLX's 4.67% return. Over the past 10 years, BBMUX has underperformed BBGLX with an annualized return of 1.84%, while BBGLX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.


BBMUX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-0.88%
YTD
-0.09%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
3.36%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
1.84%
ALL TIME*
2.03%

BBGLX

1D
2.01%
1M
1.67%
6M
8.06%
YTD
4.67%
1Y
0.29%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
13.25%
ALL TIME*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BBMUX vs. BBGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBMUX
Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund
-0.09%5.10%1.50%5.56%-8.23%2.04%4.01%7.15%1.49%4.75%
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
4.67%2.79%21.45%32.21%-26.82%23.34%34.84%33.32%0.10%25.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMUX and BBGLX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2015

0.03

Over the past year, BBMUX and BBGLX have become more correlated (0.24) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBMUX vs. BBGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBMUX
BBMUX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BBMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BBGLX
BBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBMUX vs. BBGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX) and Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBMUXBBGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.04

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

0.09

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

0.20

+4.15

BBMUX vs. BBGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the BBGLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMUX and BBGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBMUX vs. BBGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMUX drawdown since its inception was -12.65%, smaller than the maximum BBGLX drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMUX and BBGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBMUXBBGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.65%

-32.31%

+19.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-22.44%

+19.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.96%

-22.44%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.57%

-32.31%

+19.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.65%

-32.31%

+19.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-7.16%

+5.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-6.26%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

9.67%

-8.74%

Volatility

BBMUX vs. BBGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX) is 0.74%, while Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that BBMUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBMUXBBGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

4.72%

-3.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

12.02%

-10.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40%

17.00%

-14.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.26%

19.80%

-16.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.25%

19.47%

-16.22%

BBMUX vs. BBGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMUX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BBGLX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBMUX vs. BBGLX - Dividend Comparison

BBMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%7.16%0.78%0.71%7.71%3.67%2.05%5.25%0.80%0.92%0.52%
BBMUX
Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund
3.12%3.61%2.81%2.21%1.82%1.93%2.10%2.61%2.35%1.95%0.35%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBMUX and BBGLX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBGLX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to BBMUX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMUX dropped -12.65% vs BBGLX's -32.31%.

BBMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBMUX and BBGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer