BBMC vs. RSMC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and RSMC (Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. BBMC is passively managed, while RSMC is actively managed. Over the past year, BBMC returned 31.25% vs 12.14% for RSMC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBMC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RSMC.

Performance

BBMC vs. RSMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than RSMC's 13.15% return.

BBMC

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 6M: 14.49%
• 1Y: 31.25%
• 3Y*: 19.32%
• 5Y*: 8.04%
• 10Y*: —

RSMC

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 13.15%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 12.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBMC vs. RSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	16.85%	12.24%	2.78%
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF	13.15%	-1.02%	0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and RSMC is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024	0.90

The correlation between BBMC and RSMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBMC vs. RSMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBMC

BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 63
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

RSMC

RSMC Risk / Return Rank: 23
RSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
RSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 20
RSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
RSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBMC vs. RSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBMC	RSMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	0.71	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	1.12	+1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.13	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	1.16	+2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.57	3.48	+9.08

BBMC vs. RSMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the RSMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and RSMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. RSMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than RSMC's maximum drawdown of -22.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and RSMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBMC	RSMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.11%	-22.33%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-10.49%	+0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-1.11%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.86%	-5.12%	-3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	3.49%	-1.00%

Volatility

BBMC vs. RSMC - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) at 4.24%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBMC	RSMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	4.24%	+1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	12.73%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.92%	17.31%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.68%	20.26%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.09%	20.26%	+0.83%

BBMC vs. RSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RSMC's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBMC vs. RSMC - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, while RSMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.09%	1.25%	1.31%	1.36%	1.48%	0.87%	0.69%
RSMC Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBMC and RSMC in my portfolio?

BBMC and RSMC have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBMC or RSMC?

BBMC has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to RSMC (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs RSMC's -22.33%.

Which ETF is better, BBMC or RSMC?

On 1-year performance, BBMC leads with 31.25% vs 12.14% for RSMC. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, RSMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBMC or RSMC?

Over the 1-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBMC or RSMC?

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBMC or RSMC?

BBMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.00% for RSMC.

What is the main difference between BBMC and RSMC?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.75% for RSMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.