PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBMC vs. JCPB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBMC vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than JCPB's 0.58% return.


BBMC

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.96%
YTD
16.66%
6M
16.84%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

JCPB

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBMC vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
16.66%12.24%15.15%18.37%-19.77%17.64%61.98%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
0.58%7.98%2.96%7.13%-12.90%-0.51%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and JCPB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020

0.19

The correlation between BBMC and JCPB shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBMC vs. JCPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBMC
JCPB

Technology

21.6%
9.1%

Industrials

18.6%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
1.4%

Financial Services

10.6%
13.9%

Healthcare

10.0%
3.9%

Real Estate

6.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.9%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
0.5%

Energy

3.1%
1.6%

Utilities

2.6%
1.9%

Communication Services

2.4%
16.3%

Technology

BBMC
21.6%
JCPB
9.1%

Industrials

BBMC
18.6%
JCPB
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BBMC
11.5%
JCPB
1.4%

Financial Services

BBMC
10.6%
JCPB
13.9%

Healthcare

BBMC
10.0%
JCPB
3.9%

Real Estate

BBMC
6.3%
JCPB
4.6%

Basic Materials

BBMC
4.9%
JCPB
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

BBMC
3.5%
JCPB
0.5%

Energy

BBMC
3.1%
JCPB
1.6%

Utilities

BBMC
2.6%
JCPB
1.9%

Communication Services

BBMC
2.4%
JCPB
16.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBMC vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBMC vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBMCJCPBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.26

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.41

6.88

+6.54

BBMC vs. JCPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the JCPB Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and JCPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBMCJCPBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.63

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.21

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.55

+0.30

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than JCPB's maximum drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and JCPB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBMCJCPBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-16.67%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-2.71%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.18%

-5.97%

-18.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.11%

-16.67%

-13.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.48%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-4.26%

-4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

0.89%

+1.58%

Volatility

BBMC vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) at 1.26%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBMCJCPBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

1.26%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.14%

2.72%

+9.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.32%

3.77%

+12.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.59%

5.38%

+15.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

5.05%

+16.03%

BBMC vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBMC vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than JCPB's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.09%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%0.00%
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.93%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBMC and JCPB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBMC has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to JCPB (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs JCPB's -16.67%.

On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.32% vs 1.11% for JCPB. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 1.09% for BBMC.

BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while JCPB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.38% for JCPB.

BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBMC and JCPB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer