PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBMC vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBMC vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.


BBMC

1D
-0.99%
1M
2.80%
YTD
16.85%
6M
14.49%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBMC vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
16.85%12.24%15.15%8.76%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and IBIC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.00

The correlation between BBMC and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBMC vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBMC vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBMCIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.22

-0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

16.56

-13.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.57

58.67

-46.11

BBMC vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBMCIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-0.90%

-29.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-0.27%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-0.08%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-0.10%

-8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

0.08%

+2.41%

Volatility

BBMC vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBMCIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

0.17%

+5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

0.67%

+12.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.92%

0.89%

+16.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

1.56%

+19.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.09%

1.56%

+19.53%

BBMC vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBMC vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.09%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBMC and IBIC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBMC has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, BBMC leads with 31.25% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.09% for BBMC.

BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBMC and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer