PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (VDTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBM3.L is traded in GBP, while VDTY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDTY.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBM3.L achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than VDTY.L's 0.17% return.


BBM3.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.32%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
1.97%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*

VDTY.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.09%
YTD
0.17%
6M
-0.65%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
0.37%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
1.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BBM3.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.63%-2.96%7.04%-0.79%13.68%4.38%
VDTY.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.17%-1.31%2.87%-1.42%-1.90%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BBM3.L and VDTY.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

0.60

The correlation between BBM3.L and VDTY.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBM3.L
BBM3.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VDTY.L
VDTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VDTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VDTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (VDTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBM3.LVDTY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.12

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.78

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

1.93

+0.78

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the VDTY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBM3.L and VDTY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBM3.LVDTY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.69

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.08

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.13

+0.37

Drawdowns

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBM3.L drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum VDTY.L drawdown of -22.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBM3.L and VDTY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBM3.LVDTY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-22.88%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-5.74%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

-8.56%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.27%

-16.81%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.65%

-17.56%

+11.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-12.78%

+6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.31%

-0.50%

Volatility

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (VDTY.L) have volatilities of 1.89% and 1.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBM3.LVDTY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

1.88%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

5.13%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.47%

6.50%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

9.00%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.38%

10.19%

-1.81%

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBM3.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VDTY.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBM3.L vs. VDTY.L - Dividend Comparison

BBM3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VDTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBM3.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VDTY.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.25%4.29%4.31%3.40%2.09%1.21%1.54%2.34%2.33%1.57%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBM3.L and VDTY.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBM3.L.

BBM3.L tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index, while VDTY.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBM3.L and 0.05% for VDTY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBM3.L and VDTY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer