BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BBM3.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and TR3G.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist) are both Government Bonds funds - BBM3.L tracks the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index while TR3G.L tracks the Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBM3.L returned 4.64%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for TR3G.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BBM3.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TR3G.L.

Performance

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BBM3.L is traded in GBP, while TR3G.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TR3G.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBM3.L achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly higher than TR3G.L's 2.75% return.

BBM3.L

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 3.89%
• 6M: 4.42%
• 1Y: 7.55%
• 3Y*: 3.41%
• 5Y*: 4.64%
• 10Y*: —

TR3G.L

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 2.39%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 3.23%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: 3.06%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BBM3.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	3.89%	-2.95%	7.03%	-0.78%	13.48%	4.56%
TR3G.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist	2.75%	-1.98%	5.82%	-1.57%	7.69%	3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BBM3.L and TR3G.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021	0.96

The correlation between BBM3.L and TR3G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBM3.L

BBM3.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BBM3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BBM3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BBM3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
BBM3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

TR3G.L

TR3G.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
TR3G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
TR3G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
TR3G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 30
TR3G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
TR3G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBM3.L	TR3G.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.07	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	1.62	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.45	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	3.70	+0.51

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the TR3G.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBM3.L and TR3G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBM3.L drawdown since its inception was -15.26%, smaller than the maximum TR3G.L drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBM3.L and TR3G.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBM3.L	TR3G.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.26%	-24.72%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.53%	-4.51%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.77%	-8.90%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.26%	-16.36%	+1.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-11.07%	+7.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.28%	-17.10%	+10.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	1.77%	+0.02%

Volatility

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TR3G.L) at 1.52%. This indicates that BBM3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TR3G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBM3.L	TR3G.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	1.52%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.75%	4.49%	+0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.56%	6.15%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.43%	8.06%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.36%	11.90%	-3.54%

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBM3.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TR3G.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBM3.L vs. TR3G.L - Dividend Comparison

BBM3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TR3G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBM3.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TR3G.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 1-3 Year UCITS ETF Dist	3.83%	4.10%	4.31%	4.17%	1.99%	0.31%	1.28%	2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBM3.L and TR3G.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, BBM3.L and TR3G.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BBM3.L or TR3G.L?

On fees, TR3G.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBM3.L or TR3G.L?

TR3G.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBM3.L.

What is the main difference between BBM3.L and TR3G.L?

BBM3.L tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index, while TR3G.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBM3.L and 0.06% for TR3G.L.