BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L
BBM3.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PR1T.L (Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) are both Government Bonds funds - BBM3.L tracks the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index while PR1T.L tracks the Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBM3.L returned 4.56%/yr vs 4.36%/yr for PR1T.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBM3.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1T.L.
Performance
BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BBM3.L is traded in GBP, while PR1T.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PR1T.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBM3.L achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than PR1T.L's 1.87% return.
BBM3.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.93%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- —
PR1T.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 4.95%
- 3Y*
- 2.03%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- —
BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBM3.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.63% | -2.96% | 7.04% | -0.79% | 13.68% | 4.38% |
PR1T.L Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 1.87% | -3.21% | 7.04% | -0.41% | 12.57% | 4.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBM3.L and PR1T.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between BBM3.L and PR1T.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L — Risk / Return Rank
BBM3.L
PR1T.L
BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBM3.L | PR1T.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 0.96 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 2.61 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBM3.L | PR1T.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 0.75 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.52 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.23 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBM3.L drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum PR1T.L drawdown of -16.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBM3.L and PR1T.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBM3.L | PR1T.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -16.09% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.52% | -5.15% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.77% | -9.86% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.27% | -16.09% | +0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -6.37% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.31% | -7.80% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 1.89% | -0.08% |
Volatility
BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) has a higher volatility of 1.89% compared to Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) at 1.76%. This indicates that BBM3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1T.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBM3.L | PR1T.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 1.76% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.68% | 4.96% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.47% | 6.58% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.43% | 8.46% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.38% | 8.34% | +0.04% |
BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBM3.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1T.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBM3.L vs. PR1T.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBM3.L nor PR1T.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBM3.L and PR1T.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PR1T.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1T.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBM3.L.
BBM3.L tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index, while PR1T.L tracks Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBM3.L and 0.05% for PR1T.L.
Find the right allocation for BBM3.L and PR1T.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer