PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBM3.L is traded in GBP, while IBTU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBM3.L achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than IBTU.L's 1.80% return.


BBM3.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.32%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.18%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
1.97%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*

IBTU.L

1D
0.01%
1M
1.22%
YTD
1.80%
6M
1.08%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
2.11%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BBM3.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.63%-2.96%7.04%-0.79%13.68%4.38%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.80%-3.07%7.07%-0.29%13.11%4.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BBM3.L and IBTU.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

0.81

The correlation between BBM3.L and IBTU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBM3.L
BBM3.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBM3.LIBTU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

0.97

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.71

2.64

+0.07

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBM3.L and IBTU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBM3.LIBTU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

0.76

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.53

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.27

+0.24

Drawdowns

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBM3.L drawdown since its inception was -15.27%, smaller than the maximum IBTU.L drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBM3.L and IBTU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBM3.LIBTU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-19.01%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-5.12%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

-9.80%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.27%

-15.91%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.65%

-6.04%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-9.25%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.89%

-0.08%

Volatility

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) has a higher volatility of 1.89% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) at 1.75%. This indicates that BBM3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBM3.LIBTU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

1.75%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.68%

4.96%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.47%

6.55%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

8.45%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.38%

8.76%

-0.38%

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBM3.L and IBTU.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBM3.L vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

BBM3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBM3.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.07%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBM3.L and IBTU.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBM3.L and IBTU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

BBM3.L tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index, while IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBM3.L and IBTU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer