PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBM3.L achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly higher than ERN1.L's -0.32% return.


BBM3.L

1D
0.26%
1M
2.40%
YTD
3.89%
6M
4.42%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
3.41%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*

ERN1.L

1D
0.07%
1M
0.08%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
1.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BBM3.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.89%-2.95%7.03%-0.78%13.48%4.56%
ERN1.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
-0.32%8.04%-0.60%1.37%5.27%-2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BBM3.L and ERN1.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBM3.L
BBM3.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

ERN1.L
ERN1.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ERN1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBM3.LERN1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.14

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.75

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

3.64

+0.57

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the ERN1.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBM3.L and ERN1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBM3.L drawdown since its inception was -15.26%, smaller than the maximum ERN1.L drawdown of -29.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBM3.L and ERN1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBM3.LERN1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.26%

-29.99%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.53%

-1.86%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.77%

-2.97%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

-4.83%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-3.59%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-13.31%

+7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

0.90%

+0.89%

Volatility

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L) at 0.92%. This indicates that BBM3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERN1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBM3.LERN1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

0.92%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

2.68%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.56%

4.06%

+2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.43%

5.38%

+3.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.36%

6.72%

+1.64%

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBM3.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ERN1.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBM3.L vs. ERN1.L - Dividend Comparison

BBM3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERN1.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBM3.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ERN1.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
2.35%2.70%3.82%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBM3.L and ERN1.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBM3.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBM3.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for ERN1.L.

BBM3.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while ERN1.L is Ultrashort Bond. BBM3.L tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index, while ERN1.L tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBM3.L and 0.09% for ERN1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBM3.L and ERN1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer