BBLU vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBLU (Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBLU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

BBLU vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BBLU

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 10.22%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 29.32%
• 3Y*: 23.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLU vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	0.24%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLU and GRW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

BBLU vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBLU	GRW
Technology	29.3%	26.6%
Financial Services	15.9%	9.8%
Communication Services	14.6%	9.1%
Healthcare	12.5%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.6%	-
Energy	6.1%	-
Industrials	2.1%	38.1%
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BBLU vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLU

BBLU Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLU vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBLU	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.08	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.28	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBLU	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.81	14.00	-12.19

Drawdowns

BBLU vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLU drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLU and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBLU	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.20%	-0.45%	-16.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-0.45%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.98%	-0.14%	-1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBLU	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.20%	10.19%	+1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	10.19%	+4.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.53%	10.19%	+4.34%

BBLU vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBLU vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

BBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	1.14%	1.25%	1.39%	1.68%	32.08%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBLU and GRW in my portfolio?

BBLU and GRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBLU or GRW?

On fees, BBLU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBLU or GRW?

BBLU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBLU or GRW?

BBLU has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between BBLU and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBLU and 0.75% for GRW.