PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLB vs. EDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBLB vs. EDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLB achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than EDV's 3.21% return.


BBLB

1D
1.34%
1M
3.65%
YTD
2.07%
6M
1.17%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
-1.31%
5Y*
10Y*

EDV

1D
2.06%
1M
5.94%
YTD
3.21%
6M
1.53%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
-4.65%
5Y*
-9.68%
10Y*
-3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLB vs. EDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBLB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF
2.07%4.26%-7.84%-2.80%
EDV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
3.21%0.65%-12.78%-4.45%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLB and EDV is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2023

0.99

The correlation between BBLB and EDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLB vs. EDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLB
BBLB Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BBLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLB Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLB Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

EDV
EDV Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
EDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDV Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLB vs. EDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBLBEDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.07

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.39

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

0.85

+0.62

BBLB vs. EDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the EDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLB and EDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBLB vs. EDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLB drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, smaller than the maximum EDV drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLB and EDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLBEDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-59.96%

+38.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-12.54%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-26.90%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-52.64%

+45.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-23.52%

+14.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

5.65%

-2.50%

Volatility

BBLB vs. EDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) is 2.46%, while Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that BBLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLBEDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

3.83%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

10.06%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.57%

14.40%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

21.59%

-7.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.76%

19.80%

-6.04%

BBLB vs. EDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than EDV's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBLB vs. EDV - Dividend Comparison

BBLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than EDV's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF
4.88%5.03%5.34%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDV
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF
4.80%4.94%4.65%3.81%3.28%1.95%5.54%3.51%2.90%2.92%5.32%4.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BBLB and EDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EDV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to BBLB (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLB dropped -21.06% vs EDV's -59.96%.

On 3-year performance, BBLB leads with -1.31% vs -4.65% for EDV. On fees, BBLB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBLB has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BBLB has performed better with a -1.31% return vs -4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBLB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for EDV.

BBLB has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 4.80% for EDV.

BBLB tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while EDV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBLB and 0.05% for EDV.

BBLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLB and EDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer