BBLB vs. BBBL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBLB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF) and BBBL (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBLB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while BBBL is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBLB returned 5.09% vs 7.90% for BBBL. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBLB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BBBL.

Performance

BBLB vs. BBBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLB achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than BBBL's 1.22% return.

BBLB

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: -1.96%
• 1Y: 5.09%
• 3Y*: -1.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBBL

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 1.22%
• 6M: 0.19%
• 1Y: 7.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLB vs. BBBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBLB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF	-0.36%	4.26%	-2.91%
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	1.22%	7.02%	0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLB and BBBL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024	0.91

The correlation between BBLB and BBBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBLB vs. BBBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLB

BBLB Risk / Return Rank: 17
BBLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
BBLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BBLB Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BBLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
BBLB Martin Ratio Rank: 17

BBBL

BBBL Risk / Return Rank: 28
BBBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BBBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
BBBL Omega Ratio Rank: 27
BBBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BBBL Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLB vs. BBBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBLB	BBBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	1.01	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	1.48	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.18	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	1.46	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.70	3.65	-1.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBLB vs. BBBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the BBBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLB and BBBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBLB	BBBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	1.01	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.17	0.39	-0.56

Drawdowns

BBLB vs. BBBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLB drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, which is greater than BBBL's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLB and BBBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBLB	BBBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.06%	-9.43%	-11.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-5.45%	-2.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.93%	-1.89%	-7.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.94%	-3.31%	-5.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.17%	+0.83%

Volatility

BBLB vs. BBBL - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) at 2.45%. This indicates that BBLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBLB	BBBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	2.45%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.55%	5.75%	+0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.80%	7.86%	+1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.83%	9.80%	+4.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.83%	9.80%	+4.03%

BBLB vs. BBBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BBBL's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBLB vs. BBBL - Dividend Comparison

BBLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than BBBL's 5.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	5.74%	5.77%	5.19%	0.00%
BBLB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF	5.00%	5.03%	5.34%	2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBLB and BBBL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BBLB and BBBL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BBLB or BBBL?

BBLB has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to BBBL (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLB dropped -21.06% vs BBBL's -9.43%.

Which ETF is better, BBLB or BBBL?

On 1-year performance, BBBL leads with 7.90% vs 5.09% for BBLB. On fees, BBLB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBLB or BBBL?

Over the 1-year period, BBBL has performed better with a 7.90% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBLB or BBBL?

BBLB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBLB or BBBL?

BBBL has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 5.00% for BBLB.

What is the main difference between BBLB and BBBL?

BBLB is categorized as Government Bonds, while BBBL is Long-Term Bond. BBLB tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while BBBL tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBLB and 0.19% for BBBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.