PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIB vs. VTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBIB vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than VTG's -0.10% return.


BBIB

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.28%
6M
-0.29%
YTD
-0.28%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
10Y*

VTG

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.27%
YTD
-0.10%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIB vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and VTG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.96

The correlation between BBIB and VTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIB vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB
BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VTG
VTG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBIBVTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.14

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

2.94

-0.25

BBIB vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the VTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and VTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBIB vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and VTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBIBVTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-2.89%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.80%

-2.89%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-1.88%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-0.84%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.12%

0.00%

Volatility

BBIB vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) at 1.05%. This indicates that BBIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBIBVTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

1.05%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

2.65%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

3.52%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

3.52%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

3.52%

+1.19%

BBIB vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBIB vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than VTG's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBIB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF
3.93%3.95%3.76%2.69%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.54%1.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, BBIB and VTG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBIB has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to VTG (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs VTG's -2.89%.

On 1-year performance, VTG leads with 3.29% vs 3.01% for BBIB. On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTG has performed better with a 3.29% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for BBIB.

BBIB has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 3.54% for VTG.

BBIB tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.03% for VTG.

VTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIB and VTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer