BBIB vs. GBIL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL).

BBIB and GBIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBIB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y). It was launched on Apr 19, 2023. GBIL is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2016. Both BBIB and GBIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

BBIB vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBIB vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBIB Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	0.04%	7.44%	1.28%	1.34%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	0.80%	4.12%	5.24%	3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than GBIL's 0.80% return.

BBIB

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 0.04%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: 4.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 3.99%
• 3Y*: 4.66%
• 5Y*: 3.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIB vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

BBIB

Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF

Return for Risk

BBIB vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB

BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 61
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 57

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBIB	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	16.02	-14.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	81.72	-80.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	24.01	-22.81
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	199.80	-197.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.64	1,295.81	-1,290.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBIB vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the GBIL Sharpe Ratio of 16.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and GBIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBIB	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	16.02	-14.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	4.79	-4.08

Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and GBIL is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BBIB vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than GBIL's 3.89% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBIB Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	3.98%	3.95%	3.76%	2.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.89%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%

Drawdowns

BBIB vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBIB	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.36%	-0.76%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.41%	-0.02%	-2.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	0.00%	-1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-0.04%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.00%	+0.78%

Volatility

BBIB vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison

Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.08%. This indicates that BBIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBIB	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.36%	0.08%	+1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.30%	0.15%	+2.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	0.25%	+3.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.82%	0.58%	+4.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.82%	0.47%	+4.35%