BBHY vs. RIGS
BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and RIGS (RiverFront Strategic Income Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. BBHY is passively managed, while RIGS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBHY returned 4.03%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for RIGS. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for RIGS.
Performance
BBHY vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than RIGS's -1.97% return.
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
RIGS
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- 1.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 2.81%
BBHY vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 6.57% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | -1.97% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHY and RIGS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.43 |
The correlation between BBHY and RIGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHY vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank
BBHY
RIGS
BBHY vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBHY | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.04 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 0.35 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 0.82 | +12.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHY | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 0.17 | +1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.21 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.42 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
BBHY vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, which is greater than RIGS's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and RIGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHY | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -15.31% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -4.55% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.00% | -5.18% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -9.03% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -15.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -4.35% | +3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -1.60% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 1.92% | -1.39% |
Volatility
BBHY vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) is 1.16%, while RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that BBHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHY | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 2.73% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 5.33% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 9.63% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 7.57% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 7.79% | -0.26% |
BBHY vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHY vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison
BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than RIGS's 5.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.97% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% | 0.00% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 5.01% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHY and RIGS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIGS has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to BBHY (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs RIGS's -15.31%.
On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.03% vs 1.57% for RIGS. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.03% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for RIGS.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 5.01% for RIGS.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBHY and 0.48% for RIGS.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBHY and RIGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer