BBHY vs. HYLB
BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYLB (Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BBHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index while HYLB tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBHY returned 3.99%/yr vs 3.99%/yr for HYLB. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
BBHY vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBHY having a 2.13% return and HYLB slightly lower at 2.05%.
BBHY
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.79%
HYLB
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.07M | $3.06M | $2.90M | |
| $45.44M | $37.04M | $41.98M |
BBHY vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.13% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 6.57% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.05% | 8.74% | 8.14% | 12.03% | -10.80% | 3.94% | 5.04% | 14.06% | -1.80% | 6.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHY and HYLB is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2016 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BBHY and HYLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHY vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank
BBHY
HYLB
BBHY vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBHY | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.46 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 10.37 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBHY vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, which is greater than HYLB's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and HYLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHY | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -22.91% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -2.27% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.00% | -4.51% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -15.54% | +0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.13% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -2.40% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BBHY vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) at 0.83%. This indicates that BBHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHY | HYLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 0.83% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 3.09% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 3.76% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.27% | 7.48% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.48% | 8.12% | -0.64% |
BBHY vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BBHY and HYLB have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBHY vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison
BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than HYLB's 6.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.11% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
HYLB Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.55% | 6.29% | 6.31% | 5.84% | 5.53% | 4.45% | 5.22% | 5.71% | 5.95% | 5.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BBHY and HYLB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBHY has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to HYLB (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs HYLB's -22.91%.
On 5-year performance, HYLB leads with 3.99% vs 3.99% for BBHY. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 3.99% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY and HYLB have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 6.55% for HYLB.
BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and DWS.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBHY and HYLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer