BBHM vs. KMID
BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. BBHM is passively managed, while KMID is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for KMID.
Performance
BBHM vs. KMID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBHM having a 1.78% return and KMID slightly higher at 1.86%.
BBHM
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMID
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 0.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHM vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 1.78% | 2.74% |
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | 1.86% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHM and KMID is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHM vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank
BBHM
KMID
BBHM vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHM | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | -0.03 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
BBHM vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHM drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum KMID drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHM and KMID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHM | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -18.89% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -5.28% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -5.77% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.27% | — |
Volatility
BBHM vs. KMID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHM | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 14.34% | +3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 16.91% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.46% | 16.91% | +0.55% |
BBHM vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHM vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison
BBHM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHM and KMID have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KMID is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KMID is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.
KMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.
They also come from different issuers: BBH and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.80% for KMID.
Find the right allocation for BBHM and KMID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer