BBH vs. TRUH
BBH (VanEck Biotech ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from VanEck. BBH is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BBH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
BBH vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BBH
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.67%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.24M | $1.09M | $974.35K | |
| $24.34K | $32.62K | $24.57K |
BBH vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BBH VanEck Biotech ETF | 7.89% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBH and TRUH is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBH vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
BBH
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBH vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBH | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBH vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBH drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBH and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBH | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.70% | -4.51% | -68.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.22% | -2.99% | -2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -1.66% | -19.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | — | — |
Volatility
BBH vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBH | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 17.52% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 17.52% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 17.52% | +4.58% |
BBH vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBH vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
BBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBH VanEck Biotech ETF | 0.47% | 0.51% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.27% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBH and TRUH have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BBH.
BBH has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BBH and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for BBH and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer