BBGSX vs. TNBMX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

BBGSX (Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund) and TNBMX (T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)) are both mutual funds - BBGSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Bridge Builder, while TNBMX is a Global Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, BBGSX returned 2.58%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for TNBMX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBGSX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for TNBMX.

Performance

BBGSX vs. TNBMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) and T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGSX achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly higher than TNBMX's 0.62% return.

BBGSX

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 8.41%
• 6M: -0.45%
• 1Y: 10.31%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 2.58%
• 10Y*: 10.79%

TNBMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 3.90%
• 3Y*: 5.59%
• 5Y*: 1.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGSX vs. TNBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBGSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	8.41%	0.99%	14.47%	20.98%	-29.84%	16.57%	34.41%	29.01%	-2.18%	8.00%
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)	0.62%	5.25%	5.00%	10.32%	-12.30%	-1.63%	5.73%	10.77%	1.72%	1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGSX and TNBMX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017	0.10

The correlation between BBGSX and TNBMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BBGSX vs. TNBMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGSX

BBGSX Risk / Return Rank: 10
BBGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BBGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BBGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BBGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BBGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

TNBMX

TNBMX Risk / Return Rank: 42
TNBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TNBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
TNBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
TNBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
TNBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGSX vs. TNBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) and T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBGSX	TNBMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.54	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	2.46	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.34	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.63	1.69	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.87	5.68	-3.81

BBGSX vs. TNBMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the TNBMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGSX and TNBMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBGSX vs. TNBMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGSX drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, which is greater than TNBMX's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGSX and TNBMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBGSX	TNBMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.95%	-15.78%	-22.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.72%	-2.32%	-14.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.11%	-2.32%	-23.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.95%	-15.48%	-22.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.21%	-0.75%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.54%	-3.06%	-6.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	0.69%	+4.84%

Volatility

BBGSX vs. TNBMX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (BBGSX) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged) (TNBMX) at 0.80%. This indicates that BBGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TNBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBGSX	TNBMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.83%	0.80%	+6.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	2.15%	+12.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.45%	2.55%	+15.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.81%	3.63%	+18.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.02%	3.32%	+17.70%

BBGSX vs. TNBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGSX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TNBMX's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBGSX vs. TNBMX - Dividend Comparison

BBGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TNBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBGSX Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.58%	0.32%	0.19%	18.00%	12.59%	4.07%	6.12%	1.09%	0.36%
TNBMX T. Rowe Price International Bond Fund (USD Hedged)	4.79%	4.76%	4.24%	2.85%	10.20%	2.84%	1.90%	4.65%	8.20%	0.64%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBGSX and TNBMX in my portfolio?

BBGSX and TNBMX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBGSX or TNBMX?

BBGSX has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to TNBMX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGSX dropped -37.95% vs TNBMX's -15.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.