PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBGLX vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBGLX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 13.54%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.


BBGLX

1D
1.30%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
1.53%
6M
-7.75%
1Y
1.14%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
13.54%

IVV

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.43%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBGLX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
1.53%2.79%21.45%32.21%-26.82%23.34%34.84%33.32%0.10%25.33%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGLX and IVV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015

0.94

The correlation between BBGLX and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBGLX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBGLX
BBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBGLX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBGLXIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.36

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

2.76

-2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.16

12.43

-12.28

BBGLX vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGLX and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBGLX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBGLXIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-55.25%

+22.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.44%

-8.89%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.44%

-18.75%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.31%

-24.53%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

-33.90%

+1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.95%

-2.35%

-7.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-10.77%

+4.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.05%

1.97%

+7.08%

Volatility

BBGLX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBGLXIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.37%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

9.59%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

12.28%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.68%

16.95%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

18.08%

+1.37%

BBGLX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBGLX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBGLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%7.16%0.78%0.71%7.71%3.67%2.05%5.25%0.80%0.92%0.52%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BBGLX and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBGLX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGLX dropped -32.31% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBGLX and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer