BBGLX vs. FDSSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BBGLX (Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund) and FDSSX (Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX returned 12.97%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for FDSSX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BBGLX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FDSSX.

Performance

BBGLX vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX has underperformed FDSSX with an annualized return of 12.97%, while FDSSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.

BBGLX

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: -1.19%
• 6M: 2.55%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 1Y: -1.01%
• 3Y*: 10.68%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 12.97%
• ALL TIME*: 11.97%

FDSSX

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: -0.79%
• 6M: 11.52%
• YTD: 14.50%
• 1Y: 28.35%
• 3Y*: 19.68%
• 5Y*: 12.00%
• 10Y*: 14.84%
• ALL TIME*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

BBGLX vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund	1.72%	2.79%	21.45%	32.21%	-26.82%	23.34%	34.84%	33.32%	0.10%	25.33%
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	14.50%	18.89%	19.79%	26.94%	-19.55%	23.14%	24.90%	32.21%	-8.61%	24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BBGLX and FDSSX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015	0.93

The correlation between BBGLX and FDSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBGLX vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBGLX

BBGLX Risk / Return Rank: 3
BBGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BBGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BBGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BBGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BBGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

FDSSX

FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBGLX vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBGLX	FDSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	1.82	-2.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	2.50	-2.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.33	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.15	2.83	-2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	12.79	-13.14

BBGLX vs. FDSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBGLX Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the FDSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBGLX and FDSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBGLX vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and FDSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBGLX	FDSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.31%	-56.77%	+24.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.44%	-9.19%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.44%	-20.86%	-1.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.31%	-25.22%	-7.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.31%	-34.37%	+2.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.78%	-2.29%	-7.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.26%	-9.85%	+3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.65%	2.03%	+7.62%

Volatility

BBGLX vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison

Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) at 3.73%. This indicates that BBGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBGLX	FDSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	3.73%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	11.38%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.95%	14.26%	+2.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.78%	17.90%	+1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.45%	18.58%	+0.87%

BBGLX vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBGLX vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison

BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	7.16%	0.78%	0.71%	7.71%	3.67%	2.05%	5.25%	0.80%	0.92%	0.52%
FDSSX Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund	4.18%	4.79%	4.83%	2.03%	0.36%	0.84%	5.22%	6.09%	4.46%	3.07%	1.04%	5.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBGLX and FDSSX in my portfolio?

BBGLX and FDSSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBGLX or FDSSX?

BBGLX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to FDSSX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBGLX dropped -32.31% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.