BBGLX vs. BBMUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX).
BBGLX is managed by Bridge Builder. It was launched on Apr 27, 2015. BBMUX is managed by Bridge Builder. It was launched on Sep 13, 2015.
Performance
BBGLX vs. BBMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBGLX vs. BBMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund | -9.61% | 2.79% | 21.45% | 32.21% | -26.82% | 23.34% | 34.84% | 33.32% | 0.10% | 25.33% |
BBMUX Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund | -0.72% | 5.10% | 1.50% | 5.56% | -8.23% | 2.04% | 4.01% | 7.15% | 1.49% | 4.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBGLX achieves a -9.61% return, which is significantly lower than BBMUX's -0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, BBGLX has outperformed BBMUX with an annualized return of 12.34%, while BBMUX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.93% annualized return.
BBGLX
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -17.04%
- 1Y
- -0.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 5.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
BBMUX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBGLX vs. BBMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBGLX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BBMUX's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BBGLX vs. BBMUX — Risk / Return Rank
BBGLX
BBMUX
BBGLX vs. BBMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) and Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBGLX | BBMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | 1.16 | -1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.14 | 1.55 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.32 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 1.09 | -1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 3.88 | -4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBGLX | BBMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 1.16 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.28 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.60 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.65 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBGLX and BBMUX is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BBGLX vs. BBMUX - Dividend Comparison
BBGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBGLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.16% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 7.71% | 3.67% | 2.05% | 5.25% | 0.80% | 0.92% | 0.52% |
BBMUX Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund | 3.06% | 3.61% | 2.81% | 2.21% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 2.10% | 2.61% | 2.35% | 1.95% | 0.35% | 0.06% |
Drawdowns
BBGLX vs. BBMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBGLX drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than BBMUX's maximum drawdown of -12.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBGLX and BBMUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBGLX | BBMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -12.65% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.44% | -3.64% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.31% | -12.65% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.31% | -12.65% | -19.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.82% | -2.56% | -17.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -2.28% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.98% | 1.02% | +6.96% |
Volatility
BBGLX vs. BBMUX - Volatility Comparison
Bridge Builder Large Cap Growth Fund (BBGLX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX) at 0.95%. This indicates that BBGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBGLX | BBMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 0.95% | +5.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 1.55% | +12.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 3.76% | +18.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 3.21% | +16.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 3.23% | +16.17% |