PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEU vs. FLSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEU vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEU achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 3.34% return.


BBEU

1D
1.18%
1M
2.36%
YTD
6.77%
6M
9.98%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*

FLSW

1D
1.54%
1M
1.42%
YTD
3.34%
6M
7.08%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEU vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
6.77%36.37%1.85%20.31%-14.72%17.50%5.00%23.96%-13.25%
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
3.34%32.92%-1.77%16.79%-18.14%20.82%13.25%31.66%-4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEU and FLSW is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.82

The correlation between BBEU and FLSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBEU vs. FLSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBEU
FLSW

Financial Services

21.8%
18.0%

Industrials

14.8%
13.8%

Healthcare

10.7%
37.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
14.0%

Technology

7.7%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
5.2%

Basic Materials

4.5%
7.7%

Energy

3.4%

-

Utilities

3.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

2.8%
1.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.3%

Financial Services

BBEU
21.8%
FLSW
18.0%

Industrials

BBEU
14.8%
FLSW
13.8%

Healthcare

BBEU
10.7%
FLSW
37.4%

Consumer Defensive

BBEU
8.4%
FLSW
14.0%

Technology

BBEU
7.7%
FLSW
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BBEU
4.7%
FLSW
5.2%

Basic Materials

BBEU
4.5%
FLSW
7.7%

Energy

BBEU
3.4%
FLSW

-

Utilities

BBEU
3.0%
FLSW
0.2%

Communication Services

BBEU
2.8%
FLSW
1.2%

Real Estate

BBEU
0.3%
FLSW
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEU vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSW
FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEU vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBEUFLSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.05

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

3.39

+2.40

BBEU vs. FLSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the FLSW Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEU and FLSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBEUFLSWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

0.90

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.46

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.57

-0.09

Drawdowns

BBEU vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEU drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEU and FLSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEUFLSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-28.16%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-13.38%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-13.38%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-28.16%

-2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-4.89%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-5.96%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

4.12%

-0.83%

Volatility

BBEU vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) at 5.20%. This indicates that BBEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEUFLSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

5.20%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

12.22%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

15.59%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

15.71%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

16.89%

+2.43%

BBEU vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBEU and FLSW have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBEU vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison

BBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than FLSW's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.78%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
2.05%2.12%2.04%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBEU and FLSW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBEU has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to FLSW (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEU dropped -36.27% vs FLSW's -28.16%.

On 5-year performance, BBEU leads with 9.03% vs 7.13% for FLSW. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, FLSW has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBEU has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEU and FLSW have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

BBEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.05% for FLSW.

BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Franklin Templeton.

BBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEU and FLSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer