PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEU vs. FLSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEU vs. FLSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEU achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than FLSW's 8.08% return.


BBEU

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.89%
6M
5.48%
YTD
10.17%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.46%

FLSW

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.67%
6M
5.20%
YTD
8.08%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.13M$18.88M$27.96M
$259.74K$232.62K$274.84K

BBEU vs. FLSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
10.17%36.37%1.85%20.31%-14.72%17.50%5.00%23.96%-13.25%
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
8.08%32.92%-1.77%16.79%-18.14%20.82%13.25%31.66%-4.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEU and FLSW is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.82

The correlation between BBEU and FLSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBEU vs. FLSW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBEU
FLSW

Financial Services

23.2%
16.4%

Industrials

14.5%
14.5%

Healthcare

11.0%
38.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
14.0%

Technology

8.0%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
5.1%

Basic Materials

4.0%
8.1%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.9%
0.2%

Communication Services

2.5%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.2%

Financial Services

BBEU
23.2%
FLSW
16.4%

Industrials

BBEU
14.5%
FLSW
14.5%

Healthcare

BBEU
11.0%
FLSW
38.4%

Consumer Defensive

BBEU
8.1%
FLSW
14.0%

Technology

BBEU
8.0%
FLSW
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BBEU
4.3%
FLSW
5.1%

Basic Materials

BBEU
4.0%
FLSW
8.1%

Energy

BBEU
3.5%
FLSW

-

Utilities

BBEU
2.9%
FLSW
0.2%

Communication Services

BBEU
2.5%
FLSW
1.1%

Real Estate

BBEU
0.3%
FLSW
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEU vs. FLSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FLSW
FLSW Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FLSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSW Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSW Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBEU vs. FLSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBEUFLSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.69

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

5.48

+2.05

BBEU vs. FLSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the FLSW Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEU and FLSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBEU vs. FLSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEU drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, which is greater than FLSW's maximum drawdown of -28.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEU and FLSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEUFLSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-28.16%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-13.38%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-13.38%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-28.16%

-2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.67%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.04%

-5.90%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

4.11%

-0.89%

Volatility

BBEU vs. FLSW - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) have volatilities of 4.39% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEUFLSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.48%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.87%

12.65%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

15.66%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

15.85%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

16.86%

+2.40%

BBEU vs. FLSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBEU and FLSW have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBEU vs. FLSW - Dividend Comparison

BBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than FLSW's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.88%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%
FLSW
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
2.26%2.12%2.04%2.36%2.02%1.86%2.28%1.15%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBEU and FLSW have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSW has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to BBEU (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEU dropped -36.27% vs FLSW's -28.16%.

On 5-year performance, BBEU leads with 9.83% vs 7.24% for FLSW. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBEU has performed better with a 9.83% return vs 7.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEU and FLSW have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

BBEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.26% for FLSW.

BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index, while FLSW tracks FTSE Switzerland RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Franklin Templeton.

BBEU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEU and FLSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer