PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEU vs. EWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEU vs. EWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEU achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than EWN's 18.09% return.


BBEU

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.67%
YTD
5.53%
6M
8.51%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*

EWN

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.53%
YTD
18.09%
6M
18.14%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
12.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEU vs. EWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
5.53%36.37%1.85%20.31%-14.72%17.50%5.00%23.96%-13.25%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
18.09%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEU and EWN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.88

The correlation between BBEU and EWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBEU vs. EWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBEU
EWN

Financial Services

21.8%
18.1%

Industrials

14.8%
10.2%

Healthcare

10.7%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
11.5%

Technology

7.7%
34.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
1.5%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.1%

Energy

3.4%
2.1%

Utilities

3.0%

-

Communication Services

2.8%
14.7%

Real Estate

0.3%
0.7%

Financial Services

BBEU
21.8%
EWN
18.1%

Industrials

BBEU
14.8%
EWN
10.2%

Healthcare

BBEU
10.7%
EWN
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

BBEU
8.4%
EWN
11.5%

Technology

BBEU
7.7%
EWN
34.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BBEU
4.7%
EWN
1.5%

Basic Materials

BBEU
4.5%
EWN
3.1%

Energy

BBEU
3.4%
EWN
2.1%

Utilities

BBEU
3.0%
EWN

-

Communication Services

BBEU
2.8%
EWN
14.7%

Real Estate

BBEU
0.3%
EWN
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEU vs. EWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEU vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBEUEWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.57

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

9.70

-4.13

BBEU vs. EWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the EWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEU and EWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBEUEWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.73

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.38

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.31

+0.16

Drawdowns

BBEU vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEU drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, smaller than the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEU and EWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEUEWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-65.22%

+28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-13.24%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-19.77%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-43.57%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-1.30%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-16.35%

+10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.49%

-0.21%

Volatility

BBEU vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) is 5.62%, while iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that BBEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEUEWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

7.50%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

16.37%

-3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.49%

19.68%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

22.88%

-5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

21.36%

-2.04%

BBEU vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EWN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBEU vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison

BBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than EWN's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.82%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.26%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBEU and EWN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to BBEU (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEU dropped -36.27% vs EWN's -65.22%.

On 5-year performance, BBEU leads with 8.77% vs 8.69% for EWN. On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBEU has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 8.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWN.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 2.82% for BBEU.

BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index, while EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBEU and 0.50% for EWN.

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEU and EWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer