PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEM vs. TJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEM vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEM achieves a 17.16% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's -1.24% return.


BBEM

1D
0.49%
1M
-2.28%
6M
9.39%
YTD
17.16%
1Y
34.07%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.69%

TJUN

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.11%
6M
-3.34%
YTD
-1.24%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.42M$2.79M$2.95M
$28.96K$85.30K$113.88K

BBEM vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBEM and TJUN is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025

0.87

The correlation between BBEM and TJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEM vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBEM
BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TJUN
TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBEM vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBEMTJUNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.16

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

0.79

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

3.49

+4.15

BBEM vs. TJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the TJUN Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEM and TJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBEM vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEM drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -9.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEM and TJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEMTJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-9.77%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.37%

-9.77%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.54%

-6.61%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-1.08%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

2.21%

+2.16%

Volatility

BBEM vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) at 6.70%. This indicates that BBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEMTJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

6.70%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.92%

9.43%

+12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.91%

10.70%

+13.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

10.42%

+8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

10.42%

+8.44%

BBEM vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBEM vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison

BBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.95%5.86%2.73%1.94%
TJUN
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBEM and TJUN have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBEM has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to TJUN (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEM dropped -17.42% vs TJUN's -9.77%.

On 1-year performance, BBEM leads with 34.07% vs 8.16% for TJUN. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TJUN has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBEM has performed better with a 34.07% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

BBEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TJUN tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBEM and 0.95% for TJUN.

BBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEM and TJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer