BBEM vs. JCPB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while JCPB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBEM is passively managed, while JCPB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBEM returned 21.42%/yr vs 5.17%/yr for JCPB. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBEM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for JCPB.

Performance

BBEM vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEM achieves a 21.92% return, which is significantly higher than JCPB's 0.88% return.

BBEM

• 1D: -5.86%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 21.92%
• 6M: 22.38%
• 1Y: 44.01%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JCPB

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 0.88%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 5.17%
• 5Y*: 1.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEM vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	21.92%	32.43%	5.61%	6.01%
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF	0.88%	7.98%	2.96%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEM and JCPB is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.23

The correlation between BBEM and JCPB shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BBEM vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEM

BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 67
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

JCPB

JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 41
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 40
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEM vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBEM	JCPB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.43	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.12	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.25	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	1.95	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.56	5.62	+6.95

BBEM vs. JCPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the JCPB Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEM and JCPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBEM vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEM drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, roughly equal to the maximum JCPB drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEM and JCPB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBEM	JCPB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.42%	-16.67%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-2.71%	-10.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.42%	-5.97%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.86%	-1.19%	-4.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-4.24%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	0.94%	+2.57%

Volatility

BBEM vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a higher volatility of 12.60% compared to JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) at 1.06%. This indicates that BBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JCPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBEM	JCPB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.60%	1.06%	+11.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.54%	2.82%	+17.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.39%	3.73%	+18.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	5.39%	+13.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.48%	5.04%	+13.44%

BBEM vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBEM vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison

BBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than JCPB's 4.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	4.78%	5.86%	2.73%	1.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF	4.91%	4.90%	5.16%	4.32%	3.01%	2.19%	2.97%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBEM and JCPB in my portfolio?

BBEM and JCPB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBEM or JCPB?

BBEM has higher volatility (12.60%) compared to JCPB (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEM dropped -17.42% vs JCPB's -16.67%.

Which ETF is better, BBEM or JCPB?

On 3-year performance, BBEM leads with 21.42% vs 5.17% for JCPB. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBEM or JCPB?

Over the 3-year period, BBEM has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 5.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBEM or JCPB?

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBEM or JCPB?

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 4.78% for BBEM.

What is the main difference between BBEM and JCPB?

BBEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while JCPB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBEM and 0.38% for JCPB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.