PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEM vs. EVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEM vs. EVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEM achieves a 17.16% return, which is significantly lower than EVLU's 26.39% return.


BBEM

1D
0.49%
1M
-2.28%
6M
9.39%
YTD
17.16%
1Y
34.07%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.69%

EVLU

1D
0.12%
1M
0.50%
6M
16.81%
YTD
26.39%
1Y
52.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.42M$2.79M$2.95M
$154.42K$144.62K$121.49K

BBEM vs. EVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBEM and EVLU is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.92

The correlation between BBEM and EVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEM vs. EVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBEM
BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLU
EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBEM vs. EVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBEMEVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

4.01

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

11.62

-3.98

BBEM vs. EVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the EVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEM and EVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBEM vs. EVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEM drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, roughly equal to the maximum EVLU drawdown of -17.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEM and EVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEMEVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-17.17%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.37%

-12.90%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.54%

-7.82%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-3.75%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

4.44%

-0.07%

Volatility

BBEM vs. EVLU - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) at 6.36%. This indicates that BBEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEMEVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

6.36%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.92%

18.46%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.91%

20.91%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

20.37%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.86%

20.37%

-1.51%

BBEM vs. EVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLU's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBEM vs. EVLU - Dividend Comparison

BBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than EVLU's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBEM
JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.95%5.86%2.73%1.94%
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
3.85%5.20%1.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BBEM and EVLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBEM has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to EVLU (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEM dropped -17.42% vs EVLU's -17.17%.

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 52.71% vs 34.07% for BBEM. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EVLU has been the lower-risk option at 6.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 52.71% return vs 34.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EVLU.

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.95%, compared with 3.85% for EVLU.

BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBEM and 0.35% for EVLU.

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEM and EVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer