BBEM vs. DIEM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBEM (JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - BBEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net while DIEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBEM returned 23.00%/yr vs 28.35%/yr for DIEM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BBEM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DIEM.

Performance

BBEM vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEM achieves a 27.02% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 32.78% return.

BBEM

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 9.46%
• YTD: 27.02%
• 6M: 29.37%
• 1Y: 53.50%
• 3Y*: 23.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIEM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 12.08%
• YTD: 32.78%
• 6M: 35.57%
• 1Y: 60.54%
• 3Y*: 28.35%
• 5Y*: 11.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEM vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	27.02%	32.43%	5.61%	6.01%
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	32.78%	30.81%	12.29%	9.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEM and DIEM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.96

The correlation between BBEM and DIEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBEM vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBEM	DIEM
Technology	36.5%	40.3%
Financial Services	19.0%	23.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	6.7%
Industrials	8.1%	4.7%
Communication Services	6.7%	5.6%
Basic Materials	6.2%	4.2%
Energy	4.2%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	2.9%
Healthcare	2.8%	0.6%
Utilities	2.5%	4.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.6%

Return for Risk

BBEM vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEM

BBEM Risk / Return Rank: 82
BBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

DIEM

DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 90
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEM vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBEM	DIEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	3.35	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	4.26	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.62	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.10	4.93	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.16	20.34	-4.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBEM vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEM and DIEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBEM	DIEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	3.35	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.32	0.55	+0.77

Drawdowns

BBEM vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEM drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEM and DIEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBEM	DIEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.42%	-38.61%	+21.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-12.33%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.42%	-16.82%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-1.37%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-9.72%	+6.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	2.99%	+0.33%

Volatility

BBEM vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) have volatilities of 8.59% and 8.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBEM	DIEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.59%	8.52%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.20%	15.91%	+1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.49%	18.17%	+1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	16.93%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	17.59%	-0.09%

BBEM vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBEM vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

BBEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than DIEM's 2.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBEM JPMorgan Betabuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	4.59%	5.86%	2.73%	1.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	2.30%	2.99%	4.92%	4.45%	6.31%	4.06%	2.75%	5.98%	3.87%	2.61%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBEM and DIEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, BBEM and DIEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BBEM or DIEM?

BBEM has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to DIEM (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEM dropped -17.42% vs DIEM's -38.61%.

Which ETF is better, BBEM or DIEM?

On 3-year performance, DIEM leads with 28.35% vs 23.00% for BBEM. On fees, BBEM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBEM or DIEM?

Over the 3-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 28.35% return vs 23.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBEM or DIEM?

BBEM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DIEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBEM or DIEM?

BBEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 2.30% for DIEM.

What is the main difference between BBEM and DIEM?

BBEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Target Market Exposure Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBEM and 0.19% for DIEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.