BBDC vs. SIVR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBDC (Barings BDC, Inc.) is a stock, while SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past 5 years, BBDC returned 6.73%/yr vs 21.28%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BBDC vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBDC achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 4.05% return.

BBDC

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: -5.88%
• YTD: -2.52%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 7.41%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: —

SIVR

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 4.05%
• 6M: 29.45%
• 1Y: 114.25%
• 3Y*: 46.03%
• 5Y*: 21.28%
• 10Y*: 15.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBDC vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBDC Barings BDC, Inc.	-2.52%	8.84%	23.86%	18.53%	-18.59%	29.31%	-3.48%	20.40%	-13.52%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	4.05%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BBDC and SIVR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2018	0.11

The correlation between BBDC and SIVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BBDC vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBDC

BBDC Risk / Return Rank: 52
BBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 51
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBDC vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBDC	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.95	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	2.11	-1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.36	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	2.71	-2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.35	5.80	-4.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBDC vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBDC and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBDC	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	1.95	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.59	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.32	-0.05

Drawdowns

BBDC vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBDC drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBDC and SIVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBDC	SIVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.45%	-75.85%	+27.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-42.42%	+30.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.51%	-42.42%	+17.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.55%	-42.42%	+14.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-36.52%	+30.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.99%	-47.85%	+39.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.50%	19.78%	-14.28%

Volatility

BBDC vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) is 7.43%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.32%. This indicates that BBDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBDC	SIVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.43%	16.32%	-8.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.02%	58.30%	-43.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	58.84%	-40.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.38%	36.17%	-16.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.19%	31.86%	-7.67%

Dividends

BBDC vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

BBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.95%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBDC Barings BDC, Inc.	12.95%	12.96%	10.87%	11.89%	11.66%	7.44%	7.07%	5.25%	21.24%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBDC and SIVR in my portfolio?

BBDC and SIVR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBDC or SIVR?

SIVR has higher volatility (16.32%) compared to BBDC (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBDC dropped -48.45% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.