PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBD-B.TO vs. STRL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Bombardier Inc (BBD-B.TO) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBD-B.TO is traded in CAD, while STRL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the STRL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBD-B.TO achieves a 29.55% return, which is significantly lower than STRL's 196.55% return. Over the past 10 years, BBD-B.TO has underperformed STRL with an annualized return of 19.84%, while STRL has yielded a comparatively higher 70.00% annualized return.


BBD-B.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.68%
YTD
29.55%
6M
30.43%
1Y
200.58%
3Y*
72.04%
5Y*
62.44%
10Y*
19.84%

STRL

1D
1.35%
1M
7.76%
YTD
196.55%
6M
176.92%
1Y
341.76%
3Y*
159.13%
5Y*
110.71%
10Y*
70.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBD-B.TO
Bombardier Inc
29.55%138.87%83.71%1.80%24.45%250.00%-75.13%-4.93%-33.00%40.28%
STRL
Sterling Construction Company, Inc.
196.55%73.49%107.79%161.70%32.62%41.25%29.04%23.96%-27.48%79.41%

Correlation

The correlation between BBD-B.TO and STRL is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.21

The correlation between BBD-B.TO and STRL shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBD-B.TO:

CA$30.41B

STRL:

$27.68B

EPS

BBD-B.TO:

CA$9.32

STRL:

$11.19

PE Ratio

BBD-B.TO:

32.46

STRL:

79.71

PEG Ratio

BBD-B.TO:

0.83

STRL:

1.70

PS Ratio

BBD-B.TO:

3.16

STRL:

9.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBD-B.TO:

CA$9.60B

STRL:

$2.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBD-B.TO:

CA$1.88B

STRL:

$664.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

BBD-B.TO:

CA$1.70B

STRL:

$429.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBD-B.TO
BBD-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BBD-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBD-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBD-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BBD-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBD-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

STRL
STRL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bombardier Inc (BBD-B.TO) and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBD-B.TOSTRLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.57

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.42

10.53

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.46

29.67

+1.79

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBD-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.93, which is comparable to the STRL Sharpe Ratio of 4.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBD-B.TO and STRL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBD-B.TOSTRLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93

4.22

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

1.95

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

1.31

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.51

-0.39

Drawdowns

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBD-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -96.85%, which is greater than STRL's maximum drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBD-B.TO and STRL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBD-B.TOSTRLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.85%

-91.60%

-5.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-32.70%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.54%

-48.62%

+9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.64%

-48.62%

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.84%

-55.77%

-39.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.21%

-9.92%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.05%

-43.76%

-13.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.40%

11.59%

-5.19%

Volatility

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bombardier Inc (BBD-B.TO) is 13.06%, while Sterling Construction Company, Inc. (STRL) has a volatility of 24.34%. This indicates that BBD-B.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBD-B.TOSTRLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.06%

24.34%

-11.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.50%

64.03%

-24.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.53%

81.79%

-30.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.78%

57.23%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.29%

53.72%

+6.57%

Dividends

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBD-B.TO nor STRL has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bombardier Inc and Sterling Construction Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.57B
825.68M
(BBD-B.TO) Total Revenue
(STRL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BBD-B.TO values in CAD, STRL values in USD

BBD-B.TO vs. STRL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bombardier Inc and Sterling Construction Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%20222023202420252026
15.6%
23.5%
Portfolio components
BBD-B.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a gross profit of 245.90M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.

STRL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 194.30M and revenue of 825.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

BBD-B.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported an operating income of 175.08M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

STRL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.36M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.

BBD-B.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a net income of 52.13M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

STRL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sterling Construction Company, Inc. reported a net income of 95.97M and revenue of 825.68M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBD-B.TO and STRL have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBD-B.TO and STRL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer