BBCB vs. VCIT
BBCB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - BBCB tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade while VCIT tracks the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBCB returned 0.84%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for VCIT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBCB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCIT.
Performance
BBCB vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBCB achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.18% return.
BBCB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 8.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
VCIT
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
BBCB vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 2.82% | 7.69% | 1.97% | 8.42% | -15.72% | -2.23% | 10.39% | 14.86% | 0.43% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 9.34% | 3.20% | 8.98% | -13.98% | -1.77% | 9.46% | 14.10% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBCB and VCIT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between BBCB and VCIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBCB vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank
BBCB
VCIT
BBCB vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBCB | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 1.50 | +0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.79 | 2.22 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.08 | +0.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 6.95 | +3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBCB | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.50 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.19 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.75 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
BBCB vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBCB drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than VCIT's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCB and VCIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBCB | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.48% | -20.56% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.95% | -2.96% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.46% | -6.11% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.32% | -20.56% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -1.36% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -3.16% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 0.88% | -0.05% |
Volatility
BBCB vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBCB | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.38% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.98% | 3.06% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.93% | 4.10% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.25% | 6.61% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 6.28% | +1.22% |
BBCB vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBCB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBCB vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison
BBCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than VCIT's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCB JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 7.15% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.80% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, BBCB and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBCB has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to VCIT (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCB dropped -22.48% vs VCIT's -20.56%.
On 5-year performance, VCIT leads with 1.22% vs 0.84% for BBCB. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 1.22% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for BBCB.
BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 4.80% for VCIT.
BBCB tracks Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade, while VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBCB and 0.04% for VCIT.
BBCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBCB and VCIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer