BBCA vs. JQUA
BBCA (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBCA is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index, while JQUA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBCA returned 11.67%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for JQUA. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBCA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
BBCA vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBCA achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.16% return.
BBCA
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BBCA vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 10.06% | 34.40% | 12.79% | 14.92% | -12.53% | 28.16% | 6.20% | 28.93% | -15.39% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.16% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBCA and JQUA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between BBCA and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBCA vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBCA
JQUA
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Financial Services
BBCA
JQUA
Energy
BBCA
JQUA
Basic Materials
BBCA
JQUA
Industrials
BBCA
JQUA
Technology
BBCA
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
BBCA
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
BBCA
JQUA
Utilities
BBCA
JQUA
Communication Services
BBCA
JQUA
Healthcare
BBCA
JQUA
Real Estate
BBCA
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBCA vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
BBCA
JQUA
BBCA vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBCA | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 3.20 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.45 | 13.48 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBCA | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.03 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.90 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.83 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
BBCA vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBCA drawdown since its inception was -42.81%, which is greater than JQUA's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCA and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBCA | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.81% | -32.92% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -7.13% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.77% | -16.81% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.43% | -22.47% | -1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.28% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -4.16% | -1.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.69% | +0.35% |
Volatility
BBCA vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 2.82%. This indicates that BBCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBCA | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 2.82% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 8.31% | +2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.53% | 11.20% | +2.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 15.61% | +1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 17.99% | +2.15% |
BBCA vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBCA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBCA vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
BBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than JQUA's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBCA JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF | 1.72% | 1.83% | 2.36% | 2.51% | 2.65% | 2.17% | 2.41% | 2.32% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCA and JQUA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBCA has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to JQUA (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCA dropped -42.81% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.92% vs 11.67% for BBCA. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBCA.
BBCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.
BBCA is categorized as Canada Equities, while JQUA is Large Cap Growth Equities. BBCA tracks Morningstar Canada Target Market Exposure Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBCA and 0.12% for JQUA.
BBCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBCA and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer