PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBC vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBC vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBC achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -5.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BBC has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of 7.60%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.12% annualized return.


BBC

1D
-4.90%
1M
-4.81%
YTD
8.17%
6M
20.12%
1Y
123.11%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
-2.05%
10Y*
7.60%

XLV

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.85%
YTD
-5.04%
6M
-4.36%
1Y
12.27%
3Y*
5.70%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
9.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBC vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBC
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF
8.17%63.77%-1.11%-1.80%-35.13%-22.31%30.32%63.81%-18.29%57.85%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-5.04%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BBC and XLV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014

0.51

The correlation between BBC and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBC vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBC
XLV

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

BBC
100.0%
XLV
100.0%

Basic Materials

BBC

-

XLV

-

Communication Services

BBC

-

XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBC

-

XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

BBC

-

XLV

-

Energy

BBC

-

XLV

-

Financial Services

BBC

-

XLV

-

Industrials

BBC

-

XLV

-

Real Estate

BBC

-

XLV

-

Technology

BBC

-

XLV

-

Utilities

BBC

-

XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBC vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBC
BBC Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
BBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
BBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBC vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBCXLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.49

0.84

+2.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.11

1.36

+2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.15

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.82

1.18

+7.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

28.55

2.87

+25.68

BBC vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBC Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBC and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBCXLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49

0.84

+2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.37

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.55

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.46

-0.34

Drawdowns

BBC vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBC drawdown since its inception was -76.85%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBC and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.85%

-39.17%

-37.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-10.47%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.45%

-17.11%

-37.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.44%

-17.11%

-55.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.85%

-28.40%

-48.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.57%

-8.24%

-22.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.14%

-7.12%

-30.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.66%

4.30%

+0.36%

Volatility

BBC vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 4.05%. This indicates that BBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

4.05%

+7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.65%

10.32%

+16.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.74%

14.65%

+21.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.31%

14.69%

+24.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.75%

16.55%

+21.20%

BBC vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBC vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

BBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than XLV's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBC
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF
1.57%1.70%1.00%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.09%0.00%0.51%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.71%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBC and XLV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBC has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to XLV (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBC dropped -76.85% vs XLV's -39.17%.

On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.12% vs 7.60% for BBC. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.12% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBC.

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.57% for BBC.

BBC tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Clinical Trials Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBC and 0.08% for XLV.

BBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBC and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer