BBC vs. TRUH
BBC (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. BBC is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BBC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
BBC vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BBC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- 6M
- 16.85%
- YTD
- 27.03%
- 1Y
- 132.20%
- 3Y*
- 29.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.30%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $614.18K | $1.46M | $1.24M | |
| $24.34K | $32.62K | $24.57K |
BBC vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BBC Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF | 15.47% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBC and TRUH is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBC vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
BBC
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBC vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBC | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.93 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBC vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBC drawdown since its inception was -76.85%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBC and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBC | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.85% | -4.51% | -72.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.46% | -2.99% | -15.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.87% | -1.66% | -35.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | — | — |
Volatility
BBC vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBC | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.52% | 17.52% | +19.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.61% | 17.52% | +22.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.72% | 17.52% | +20.20% |
BBC vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBC vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
BBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBC Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF | 1.34% | 1.70% | 1.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBC and TRUH have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBC.
BBC has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBC and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for BBC and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer