BBC vs. PBPH
BBC (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BBC tracks the LifeSci Biotechnology Clinical Trials Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
BBC vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBC achieves a 25.75% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 2.63% return.
BBC
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 25.75%
- 6M
- 22.73%
- 1Y
- 156.95%
- 3Y*
- 27.00%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.15%
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBC vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBC Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF | 25.75% | 8.23% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 2.63% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBC and PBPH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBC vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
BBC
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBC vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBC vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBC drawdown since its inception was -76.85%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBC and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.85% | -11.10% | -65.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.28% | -5.21% | -14.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -4.36% | -32.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | — | — |
Volatility
BBC vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBC | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.27% | 17.07% | +19.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 17.07% | +22.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.75% | 17.07% | +20.68% |
BBC vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBC vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
BBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBC Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF | 1.35% | 1.70% | 1.00% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBC and PBPH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBC.
BBC has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
BBC tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Clinical Trials Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BBC and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for BBC and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer