BBBS vs. PCMM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM).

BBBS and PCMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBBS is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. PCMM is an actively managed fund by BondBloxx. It was launched on Dec 2, 2024.

Performance

BBBS vs. PCMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBBS vs. PCMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	0.07%	6.67%	-0.08%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	-0.92%	6.30%	0.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than PCMM's -0.92% return.

BBBS

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCMM

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 6M: 0.37%
• 1Y: 3.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBS vs. PCMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PCMM's 0.68% expense ratio.

PCMM

BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF

BBBS

Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

BBBS vs. PCMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBS

BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 94
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 95
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PCMM

PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 34
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 31
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBS vs. PCMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBBS	PCMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	0.60	+1.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.21	0.90	+2.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.12	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	0.77	+2.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.47	4.26	+9.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBBS vs. PCMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the PCMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and PCMM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBBS	PCMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	0.60	+1.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.37	0.87	+1.51

Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and PCMM is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BBBS vs. PCMM - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than PCMM's 6.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	4.58%	4.55%	4.31%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	6.83%	7.02%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. PCMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum PCMM drawdown of -4.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and PCMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBBS	PCMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-4.32%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.45%	-3.99%	+2.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.89%	-2.16%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.27%	-0.39%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.72%	-0.35%

Volatility

BBBS vs. PCMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.98%, while BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBBS	PCMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	1.48%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.32%	2.34%	-1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25%	5.49%	-3.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.27%	5.11%	-2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.27%	5.11%	-2.84%