BBBS vs. PCMM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBBS (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and PCMM (BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBS is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while PCMM is a CLO fund actively managed by BondBloxx. BBBS is passively managed, while PCMM is actively managed. Over the past year, BBBS returned 4.44% vs 4.09% for PCMM. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBBS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for PCMM.

Performance

BBBS vs. PCMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than PCMM's 1.05% return.

BBBS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PCMM

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 4.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBS vs. PCMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	0.77%	6.67%	-0.08%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	1.05%	6.30%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and PCMM is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

BBBS vs. PCMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBS

BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PCMM

PCMM Risk / Return Rank: 34
PCMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
PCMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PCMM Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PCMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PCMM Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBS vs. PCMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBBS	PCMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.07	+1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	1.53	+2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.20	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	1.91	+1.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	6.62	+5.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBBS vs. PCMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the PCMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and PCMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBBS	PCMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	1.07	+1.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.37	1.06	+1.30

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. PCMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum PCMM drawdown of -4.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and PCMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBBS	PCMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.45%	-4.32%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.45%	-2.16%	+0.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.51%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-0.43%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.35%	0.62%	-0.27%

Volatility

BBBS vs. PCMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.49%, while BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBBS	PCMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.49%	1.12%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.36%	2.64%	-1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87%	3.86%	-1.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.23%	4.97%	-2.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.23%	4.97%	-2.74%

BBBS vs. PCMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PCMM's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBBS vs. PCMM - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than PCMM's 6.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF	4.58%	4.55%	4.31%
PCMM BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF	6.63%	7.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBBS and PCMM in my portfolio?

BBBS and PCMM have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBBS or PCMM?

PCMM has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to BBBS (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs PCMM's -4.32%.

Which ETF is better, BBBS or PCMM?

On 1-year performance, BBBS leads with 4.44% vs 4.09% for PCMM. On fees, BBBS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBBS or PCMM?

Over the 1-year period, BBBS has performed better with a 4.44% return vs 4.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBBS or PCMM?

BBBS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for PCMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBBS or PCMM?

PCMM has the higher dividend yield at 6.63%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.

What is the main difference between BBBS and PCMM?

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while PCMM is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.68% for PCMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.