PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBBS vs. IGSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBBS vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than IGSB's 1.22% return.


BBBS

1D
0.19%
1M
0.05%
6M
0.81%
YTD
1.10%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.04%

IGSB

1D
0.23%
1M
0.13%
6M
0.88%
YTD
1.22%
1Y
3.41%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
2.73%
ALL TIME*
2.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.16M$1.09M$1.73M
$152.08M$136.92M$160.63M

BBBS vs. IGSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and IGSB is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.94

The correlation between BBBS and IGSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBBS vs. IGSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBBS
BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IGSB
IGSB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IGSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBBS vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBBSIGSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.35

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

9.25

-0.45

BBBS vs. IGSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the IGSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and IGSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum IGSB drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and IGSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBSIGSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-13.38%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-1.46%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.84%

+0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.37%

0.00%

Volatility

BBBS vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) has a higher volatility of 0.57% compared to iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) at 0.54%. This indicates that BBBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBSIGSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

0.54%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

1.58%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

1.89%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

2.95%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

3.47%

-1.24%

BBBS vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IGSB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBBS vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, which matches IGSB's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBBS
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.55%4.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.61%4.44%4.02%3.26%2.07%1.82%2.36%3.06%2.46%1.65%1.45%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BBBS and IGSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBBS has higher volatility (0.57%) compared to IGSB (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs IGSB's -13.38%.

On 1-year performance, IGSB leads with 3.41% vs 3.24% for BBBS. On fees, IGSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IGSB has performed better with a 3.41% return vs 3.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBS.

IGSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while IGSB is Corporate Bonds. BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while IGSB tracks ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.04% for IGSB.

IGSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBBS and IGSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer