PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBBS vs. HYSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBBS vs. HYSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than HYSA's 1.64% return.


BBBS

1D
0.19%
1M
0.05%
6M
0.81%
YTD
1.10%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.04%

HYSA

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.18%
6M
1.09%
YTD
1.64%
1Y
3.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.16M$1.09M$1.73M
$394.63K$835.56K$981.20K

BBBS vs. HYSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and HYSA is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBBS vs. HYSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBBS
BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBBS vs. HYSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBBSHYSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.14

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.22

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

4.85

+3.95

BBBS vs. HYSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the HYSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and HYSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. HYSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum HYSA drawdown of -4.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and HYSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBSHYSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-4.90%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-3.15%

+1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.23%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.67%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.81%

-0.44%

Volatility

BBBS vs. HYSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.57%, while Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBSHYSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.57%

1.28%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.54%

3.62%

-2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84%

4.80%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

5.97%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

5.97%

-3.74%

BBBS vs. HYSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than HYSA's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBBS vs. HYSA - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than HYSA's 6.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BBBS
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.55%4.31%0.00%
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.73%6.70%6.99%2.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBBS and HYSA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYSA has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to BBBS (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs HYSA's -4.90%.

On 1-year performance, HYSA leads with 3.82% vs 3.24% for BBBS. On fees, BBBS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYSA has performed better with a 3.82% return vs 3.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBBS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HYSA.

HYSA has the higher dividend yield at 6.73%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while HYSA is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.55% for HYSA.

BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBBS and HYSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer