BBBS vs. COMT
BBBS (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBBS is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBBS returned 4.04% vs 33.20% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. BBBS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
BBBS vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.
BBBS
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 26.18%
- YTD
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
BBBS vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.97% | 6.67% | 4.97% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 30.19% | 6.07% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBBS and COMT is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | -0.20 |
The correlation between BBBS and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to -0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBBS vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
BBBS
COMT
BBBS vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBBS | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 1.90 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.26 | 6.35 | +4.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBBS vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBBS | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -51.89% | +50.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.45% | -17.57% | +16.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -11.28% | +11.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -23.95% | +23.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 5.24% | -4.88% |
Volatility
BBBS vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.67%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBBS | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 5.91% | -5.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 19.67% | -18.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 21.54% | -19.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.24% | 21.20% | -18.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.24% | 18.85% | -16.61% |
BBBS vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBBS vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBBS Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.55% | 4.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.95% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBBS and COMT have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to BBBS (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 33.20% vs 4.04% for BBBS. On fees, BBBS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 33.20% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBBS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.
BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while COMT is Commodities. BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.48% for COMT.
BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBBS and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer