PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBBS vs. BBBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBBS vs. BBBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than BBBL's 1.50% return.


BBBS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBBL

1D
0.27%
1M
1.28%
YTD
1.50%
6M
0.79%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBS vs. BBBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and BBBL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.79

The correlation between BBBS and BBBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBBS vs. BBBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBS
BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BBBL
BBBL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
BBBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBS vs. BBBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBBSBBBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.16

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.29

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

3.23

+9.36

BBBS vs. BBBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the BBBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and BBBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBBSBBBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

0.90

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.37

0.41

+1.96

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. BBBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum BBBL drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and BBBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBSBBBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-9.43%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-5.45%

+4.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.62%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-3.30%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

2.17%

-1.82%

Volatility

BBBS vs. BBBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.49%, while Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) has a volatility of 2.39%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBSBBBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

2.39%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

5.75%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

7.86%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

9.80%

-7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

9.80%

-7.57%

BBBS vs. BBBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BBBS and BBBL have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBBS vs. BBBL - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than BBBL's 5.72% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBBS and BBBL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBBL has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to BBBS (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs BBBL's -9.43%.

On 1-year performance, BBBL leads with 6.99% vs 4.44% for BBBS. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBBL has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBBS and BBBL have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

BBBL has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BBBL is Long-Term Bond. BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while BBBL tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBBS and BBBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer