BBBL vs. ZTEN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBBL (Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF) and ZTEN (F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Long-Term Bond funds - BBBL tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross while ZTEN tracks the ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BBBL returned 6.99% vs 6.32% for ZTEN. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBBL charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZTEN.

Performance

BBBL vs. ZTEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBL achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than ZTEN's 0.33% return.

BBBL

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 0.79%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZTEN

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.33%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 6.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBL vs. ZTEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	1.50%	7.02%	0.02%
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.33%	9.15%	0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BBBL and ZTEN is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024	0.95

The correlation between BBBL and ZTEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBBL vs. ZTEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBL

BBBL Risk / Return Rank: 25
BBBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
BBBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BBBL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BBBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BBBL Martin Ratio Rank: 24

ZTEN

ZTEN Risk / Return Rank: 38
ZTEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ZTEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ZTEN Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ZTEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ZTEN Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBL vs. ZTEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) and F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBBL	ZTEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.28	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	1.87	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.23	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	1.91	-0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.23	6.21	-2.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBBL vs. ZTEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBL Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the ZTEN Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBL and ZTEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBBL	ZTEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	1.28	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	1.16	-0.76

Drawdowns

BBBL vs. ZTEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBL drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, which is greater than ZTEN's maximum drawdown of -3.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBL and ZTEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBBL	ZTEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.43%	-3.43%	-6.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.45%	-3.32%	-2.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-1.30%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-0.79%	-2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	1.02%	+1.15%

Volatility

BBBL vs. ZTEN - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBL) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTEN) at 1.60%. This indicates that BBBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBBL	ZTEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.39%	1.60%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.75%	3.77%	+1.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.86%	4.99%	+2.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.80%	5.79%	+4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.80%	5.79%	+4.01%

BBBL vs. ZTEN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBL has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTEN's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BBBL vs. ZTEN - Dividend Comparison

BBBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.72%, more than ZTEN's 5.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BBBL Bondbloxx BBB Rated 10+ Year Corporate Bond ETF	5.72%	5.77%	5.19%
ZTEN F/M 10-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	5.07%	5.16%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBBL and ZTEN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, BBBL and ZTEN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BBBL or ZTEN?

BBBL has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to ZTEN (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBL dropped -9.43% vs ZTEN's -3.43%.

Which ETF is better, BBBL or ZTEN?

On 1-year performance, BBBL leads with 6.99% vs 6.32% for ZTEN. On fees, ZTEN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ZTEN has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBBL or ZTEN?

Over the 1-year period, BBBL has performed better with a 6.99% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBBL or ZTEN?

ZTEN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBBL or ZTEN?

BBBL has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 5.07% for ZTEN.

What is the main difference between BBBL and ZTEN?

BBBL tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 10+ Year Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ZTEN tracks ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBL and 0.15% for ZTEN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZTEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.